Pre-prototype · Concept validation · Risk sequencing

Technical Feasibility Review

Before you build anything, find out what you'd be building toward.

Most early prototypes fail not because the concept is wrong but because the experiments were run in the wrong order. The thing that kills the project was knowable on day one — it just wasn't tested first. A feasibility review maps the unknowns in your concept, sequences them by which one kills the project if wrong, and identifies the minimum experiments that justify the next dollar of spend.


Start here — instant reports

Feasibility Signal Report — $49

Is this concept buildable? What's the first thing that has to be true? A structured go/no-go assessment.

Start →

Unknown Sequencer — $39

Which of your unknowns kills the project if you're wrong about it? Ranked by damage, with suggested proof order.

Start →

TRL Gap Map — $79

Where you actually are on the technology readiness scale, and what evidence it would take to move. Directly applicable to SBIR and ARPA submissions.

Start →

Full feasibility review with go/no-go milestone ladder → $250 · Risk Closure Matrix upgrade → $750


Full review — what you receive

Scope boundary This is a pre-prototype technical analysis, not engineering execution. The deliverable is the diagnostic and plan that justifies the next experiment — not CAD, not prototype builds, not software development.

Begin 48-Hour Review →

$250 triage · 48-hour turnaround · $750 Risk Closure Matrix upgrade available
Send a concept description, notes, mandate, or any existing draft.

Confidential by default · Not used for training · You own the output