Find the technical failure before the reviewer does.
InTelluric independently reviews early-stage science, engineering claims, proposals, diligence materials, and invention disclosures. We identify where the mechanism, evidence, claims, or work plan stops being traceable—and return a written review with specific repair actions.
$3,000 · 48 hours · one written deliverable
For one proposal, technical memorandum, diligence package, invention disclosure, or engineering concept. The review identifies material technical failure points, explains their decision impact, and returns a prioritized repair plan.
- Mechanism and claim-chain review
- Evidence and assumption gaps
- Reviewer objections and decision risks
- Specific repair actions
Not included: copyediting or submission management; legal, regulatory, or investment advice; experimental validation.
Submit nonconfidential project context, artifact type, decision-maker, and deadline. No document upload at intake. Scope is confirmed first.
Mechanism → evidence → claims → objectives → milestones → work plan. Material gaps, unsupported assumptions, and decision risks are identified.
A reviewer-risk map, technical review memorandum, revised artifact, or engineering specification is returned according to accepted scope.
Inspect the technical question, analysis, and returned deliverable.
Representative technical reviews, diligence reports, feasibility assessments, engineering specifications, and invention-disclosure work. Each example identifies the issue reviewed, the analysis performed, and the deliverable produced.
THGM — Denied-Environment Communications
Technical issue: nonlinear acoustic and telluric transduction treated as one continuous claim. Review performed: stage-by-stage transduction and proposal-alignment review. Deliverable: scoring-risk summary and milestone-mapped audit.
PBMAC — Energy Materials Measurement Program
Technical issue: advocacy substituted for a reviewer-testable measurement program. Review performed: evidence baseline and reproducibility review. Deliverable: missing-measurement map and rewrite-ready outline.
Non-Contact EM Turbulence Sensor
Technical issue: broad fluid-class claims exceeded the viable signal-to-noise envelope. Review performed: physical-realizability and market-focus diligence. Deliverable: fluid-class verdicts and a liquid-metal roadmap.
Hydraulic Quarter-Wave Stub Pulsation Suppressor
Technical issue: no analytical design specification existed. Review performed: closed-form hydraulic transmission-line derivation. Deliverable: fabrication-ready parameterized specification.
Rapid Independent Technical Review
$3,000 · 48 hoursOne artifact reviewed before an external decision; written review and repair plan.
Proposal Red Team Review
Scoped from the artifactEvaluator scoring risk and prioritized revisions for government and grant proposals.
Technical Due Diligence
Scoped before paymentDiligence memorandum, risk register, and conditioned verdict for a decision-maker.
Engineering Specification and R&D Origination
QuotedArchitecture, derivation, and issue-ready engineering specification.
- Fixed scope. No open-ended engagement.
- Fixed price, stated before payment.
- Human technical review. No unreviewed AI output delivered as a finding.
- Confidentiality first. Nonconfidential metadata only until secure handoff.
- Exit-clean. Every engagement has a defined deliverable, end state, and handoff.
Electromagnetic systems and sensing
Motional induction, induced B-field fluctuation, magnetic Reynolds number, fluxgate instrumentation, lock-in excitation, gradiometric noise rejection, near-field coupling, and operating-envelope derivation.Acoustics, fluid mechanics, and hydraulic systems
Quarter-wave stub resonators, gear-mesh attenuation, hydraulic characteristic impedance, distributed-parameter analysis, acoustic threshold gates, and pipe-wall compliance correction.Photonics, condensed matter, and THz band
Polariton condensates, nonlinear cascade, polar lattice modes, momentum mismatch analysis, coherent modal injection, thermalization conditions, and near-field coupling requirements.Biomedical devices and neuromodulation
Non-invasive cranial-nerve engagement, pad geometry, tissue current distribution, physiological signal chains, IRB structure, and Phase I evidence requirements.Patent architecture and invention disclosure
Cross-domain topology transfer, novelty, obviousness, enablement analysis, embodiment construction, and prosecution-risk quantification.Materials science and process engineering
Volatile ceramic templating, sintered fluid behavior, DOE/ARPA-E measurement design, evidence baselines, and reproducibility bottleneck analysis.Have a technical decision ahead?
Submit nonconfidential project context, artifact type, decision-maker, and deadline.