SBIR · STTR · NSF · ARPA-E · NIH · DOD — PROPOSAL COMPOSITION AND TECHNICAL REVIEW

SBIR Proposal Writing and Technical Review

Bring notes, data, an outline, or a messy draft. InTelluric can build the technical volume, repair it stage by stage, or red-team the version you already have.

This applies equally to hardware proposals, software innovation claims, algorithm feasibility arguments, and AI system development plans. The technical merit criteria do not change by domain.

What breaks in SBIR technical sections is almost always the same thing: a mechanism that is described but not defended, claims that are asserted but not supported, and milestones that do not retire the stated technical risk. That can be fixed before drafting, during composition, after a rough technical volume exists, or in a final red-team pass.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Full technical-volume composition from notes, data, or outline
Stage-by-stage proposal repair and technical narrative development
Claim inventory
Mechanism audit
Evidence-gap matrix
Reviewer objection map
Milestone risk assessment
Technical approach review
Repair priorities

Scope boundary: This is technical proposal composition and review for real R&D submissions. Red-team review is one option; full technical-volume buildout, section repair, mechanism development, milestone logic, evidence mapping, and reviewer-risk reduction are all in scope. Not templates, coursework, or generic grant boilerplate.

CURRENT ARPA-H ROUTE

Open Fixed-Scope ARPA-H Offers ›

$3,000 Rapid Independent Technical Review · $15,500 Comprehensive Technical Review and Revision · $20,000 Reserved Technical Review Capacity
Prices, binding deliverables, exclusions, intake, and secure checkout are stated before payment.

For a smaller independent first pass outside the ARPA-H scope, start the $250 Accelerated Independent Technical Review.